Jan 15, 2021 · Expert news, reviews and videos of the latest digital cameras, lenses, accessories, and phones. Get answers to your questions in our photography forums. RF 15-35 or 24-70. So I've used Canon for a while and I made the switch to the EOS R not too long ago. I've realized two things: the adapter for the EF 24-70 that I use adds some extra weight and length that could be pared down somewhat by switching to the RF version. I usually carry my camera with one lens everywhere, every day, (unless I For only $100 more, the combo with 16-80 offers: weather sealing, better stabilization, more zoom range, and a bit sharper images. The only advantage 18-55 has is that it is just a tad bit smaller/lighter. Also, if you decide to sell the kit lens later, 16-80 will bring in about $600ish while 18-55 will bring in about $250ish. Had both at one point and ended up keeping the 16-80. The 2mm on the wide end and extra reach is exactly what I needed. The f4 is more than enough for me. I tend to stay in the 5.6 - 8 range anyway. inverse_squared X-T20 • 3 yr. ago. Both are good lenses. Depends on your needs, and depends on whether you plan on buying additional lenses. Dec 18, 2019 · The Fujifilm XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR is a versatile, everyday lens for X-mount cameras. We show you how it compares for image quality, and Jordan tells us why he thinks its a great lens for shooting video. Subscribe to our YouTube channel to get new episodes of DPReview TV every week. The new NIKKOR 16-80 f/2.8-4 is sculpted from polycarbonate. Its older sibling, the NIKKOR 17-55 f/2.8, is a metal monster of a lens. The new lens’s satin texture makes the plastic body feel solid and keeps it from screaming, “Plastic!”. Rub your hands over it, however, and it definitely does not feel like painted metal. 1HXUEdv.

16 55 vs 16 80